
Wages for Housework
Wages for Housework by Emily Callaci is one of 2026's most credible books, appearing on 1 of the year's most respected lists, including The Guardian, for a Consensus Score of 16 out of 100.
Appears on these lists
Our take
AI-draftedCallaci reconstructs the 1970s campaign led by Selma James, Silvia Federici, Mariarosa Dalla Costa, and others to demand state wages for domestic labor, a movement that split feminists at the time, since paying women for housework could be read as either overdue recognition or a way of re-entrenching them in the home just as many were trying to leave it. Callaci, writing partly out of her own experience of new motherhood colliding with an academic workload, doesn't resolve that tension so much as sit inside it, treating the campaign's contradictions as the most interesting thing about it rather than a flaw to explain away. Reviewers have noted the book's strength is less in vindicating the movement's practical failure than in taking its theoretical provocation seriously on its own terms.
In the press
“A significant contribution to the new Wages for Housework literature.”
The Nation
How the Consensus Score is calculated
Our Consensus Score is our own transparent editorial metric — not a user rating. It weighs each list by the credibility of its source, how recent the listing is, and any award status. Here is the full breakdown.
| Source | Authority | Recency | Award | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Guardian | 0.85 | 0.85 | 1.00× | 0.72 |
| Weighted sum → Score | 0.72 → 16 | |||
Similar consensus books
Because they appear on some of the same lists.
Frequently asked
What lists is Wages for Housework on?
Wages for Housework appears on 1 list in our 2026 corpus, including The Guardian.
What is its Consensus Score?
Wages for Housework has a Consensus Score of 16 out of 100, our transparent editorial measure of how many credible lists agree on it.



