SHORTLIST
Cover of I Deliver Parcels in Beijing

I Deliver Parcels in Beijing

  • An Economist Best Book of 2025

I Deliver Parcels in Beijing by Hu Anyan is one of 2026's most credible books, appearing on 2 of the year's most respected lists, including The Economist, The Guardian, for a Consensus Score of 34 out of 100.

Appears on these lists

Our take

AI-drafted

Hu spent two decades cycling through China's gig economy, and this memoir, expanded from his viral blog, catalogs nineteen jobs with a flat, unsentimental precision, less interested in outrage than in logging exactly how a delivery route, a warehouse shift or a security-guard post actually works. The early chapters can read like inventory before the book finds its shape; the payoff comes as Hu's own exhaustion and stray observations start pushing through the procedural detail, turning a study of labor systems into something more personal. There's no arc of escape or redemption here, which is the point: it's a ledger of what gig work costs, told by someone who did the math himself, job by job.

In the press

  • Although this book is full of illuminating and often startling detail, it is written in flat, one-note prose that I found uninviting
    The Guardian
  • At its best...hypnotic; at its worst, it is boring
    Becca Rothfeld, The Washington Post

How the Consensus Score is calculated

Our Consensus Score is our own transparent editorial metric — not a user rating. It weighs each list by the credibility of its source, how recent the listing is, and any award status. Here is the full breakdown.

SourceAuthorityRecencyAwardContribution
The Economist0.950.851.00×0.81
The Guardian0.850.851.00×0.72
Weighted sum → Score1.5334

Similar consensus books

Because they appear on some of the same lists.

Flesh

David Szalay

Frequently asked

What lists is I Deliver Parcels in Beijing on?

I Deliver Parcels in Beijing appears on 2 lists in our 2026 corpus, including The Economist, The Guardian.

What is its Consensus Score?

I Deliver Parcels in Beijing has a Consensus Score of 34 out of 100, our transparent editorial measure of how many credible lists agree on it.